Brain Conflux operates under a revolutionary transparent publishing model that prioritizes open scholarly discourse and accountability. Our commitment extends beyond publication to ensuring the ongoing integrity of the academic record through comprehensive post-publication review mechanisms. We believe that transparency strengthens science and fosters trust within the global research community.

Transparency Principles: All published articles include named handling editors and reviewers who have publicly endorsed the work's academic integrity. This unprecedented level of transparency creates a foundation for meaningful post-publication engagement and quality assurance.

Fostering Academic Dialogue

We encourage active engagement with published research through our comprehensive post-publication comment system. This platform facilitates meaningful scholarly dialogue, enables researchers to share related findings, and provides a mechanism for addressing concerns or questions about published work. All comments undergo rigorous peer review to ensure they contribute constructively to academic discourse.

Types of Acceptable Comments

Scientific Commentary

• Methodological observations
• Additional data interpretation
• Related research findings
• Technical clarifications

Constructive Critique

• Evidence-based disagreements
• Alternative interpretations
• Reproducibility concerns
• Statistical questions

Updates & Corrections

• Minor error notifications
• Updated reference information
• Clarification requests
• Supplementary information

Comment Submission Requirements

• Real identity required - pseudonyms strictly prohibited
• Peer review process applies to all submissions
• Professional, respectful tone mandatory
• Evidence-based arguments with proper citations
• Compliance with editorial guidelines

Editorial Oversight: Brain Conflux reserves the right to edit or reject comments that are derogatory, off-topic, or fail to contribute meaningfully to scholarly discourse. All comments are subject to the same ethical standards as our published articles, including requirements for accuracy, integrity, and professional conduct.

Comprehensive Investigation Framework

Our formal complaints procedure follows internationally recognized standards established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). We handle all concerns with the utmost seriousness, ensuring fair, thorough, and confidential investigation of potential academic misconduct, ethical violations, or scholarly errors. Our goal is to maintain the integrity of the scientific record while protecting the rights of all parties involved.

Step-by-Step Complaint Process

Maintaining Scientific Record Integrity

Brain Conflux maintains a comprehensive framework for addressing errors and ensuring the accuracy of the scientific record. Our procedures distinguish between minor corrections, substantial amendments, and cases requiring retraction, with each category following specific protocols designed to maintain transparency while minimizing confusion in the literature.

Minor Corrections

Eligible Issues:

• Typographical errors
• Formatting inconsistencies
• Reference corrections
• Affiliation updates
• Minor data entry errors

Processing Time: 5-10 business days

Substantial Amendments

Requiring Review:

• Data calculation errors
• Methodological clarifications
• Interpretation modifications
• Additional author inclusion
• Supplementary data updates

Processing Time: 15-30 business days

Retraction Cases

Serious Violations:

• Data fabrication/falsification
• Plagiarism or self-plagiarism
• Duplicate publication
• Ethical violations
• Fundamental methodology flaws

Processing Time: 45-90 business days

Correction Implementation Process

All corrections follow our standardized implementation protocol to ensure transparency and traceability. Authors are notified at each stage, and all changes are permanently documented with clear versioning and timestamps. Retracted articles remain accessible with prominent retraction notices to preserve the scientific record while preventing misleading citations.

Adherence to Global Best Practices

Brain Conflux strictly adheres to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines and flowcharts for handling publication misconduct, ethical concerns, and disputes. Our procedures are regularly updated to reflect evolving international standards and best practices in academic publishing. We participate actively in the global publishing ethics community and contribute to the development of ethical publishing standards.

COPE Membership

Brain Conflux maintains active membership in COPE and regularly participates in:

• Annual conferences and workshops
• Case study discussions
• Policy development initiatives

Flowchart Implementation

We utilize COPE flowcharts for systematic handling of:

• Authorship disputes
• Peer review misconduct
• Data integrity concerns

Continuous Training

Our editorial team receives regular training on:

• Latest ethical guidelines
• Investigation procedures
• Conflict resolution strategies

General Complaints

Email: complaints@brainconflux.com

For all formal complaints and concerns

Post-Publication Comments

Email: comments@brainconflux.com

For scholarly discourse submissions

Error Corrections

Email: corrections@brainconflux.com

For article corrections and amendments

Emergency Hotline

Phone: +1-555-ETHICS

24/7 for urgent ethical concerns

Response Expectations

Initial Acknowledgment: Within 48 hours

Preliminary Assessment: Within 5 business days

Full Investigation: 30-90 days

Investigation Confidentiality

All investigations are conducted confidentially. Status updates are not provided during ongoing investigations to protect all parties involved.

Communication Standards

All correspondence must maintain professional standards. Disrespectful communication will result in termination of the complaint process.

Documentation Retention

All complaint documentation is retained for a minimum of 7 years in accordance with academic publishing standards and legal requirements.